Foreign affairs and sovereignty
Foreign policy, defence, trade and national sovereignty.
17 registered parties reviewed. 6 have citable material and 7 claims are recorded.
Rows without a claim mean no citable publication was found in material checked through 9 August 2026. This does not prove a party has no view.
A party source establishes what the party proposed. It does not by itself prove effectiveness, implementation or complete costing. Coverage reflects the verified material currently available.
- Published position
- At least one public party claim is summarised and linked to its source.
- Topic mentioned, no detailed citable position
- The party refers to this topic, but material checked through 9 August 2026 did not support a claim-level summary.
- No published position found
- No citable party publication on this topic was found in material checked through 9 August 2026. This does not prove the party has no view.
| Party | Published claims or coverage status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
NationalThe New Zealand National PartyGovernment coalition49 seats | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Open the full party page |
LabourNew Zealand Labour PartyParliamentary opposition34 seats | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |
Green PartyThe Green Party of Aotearoa New ZealandParliamentary opposition14 seats | Party position What this means Argues for an independent foreign policy that emphasises peace, democracy, international law, the self-determination of peoples and shared climate action in international affairs. | Evidence and checksVerification note: This is currently a statement of principle and direction, not a specific proposal with costs or an implementation timetable. |
ACTACT New ZealandGovernment coalition11 seats | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Open the full party page |
NZ FirstNew Zealand First PartyGovernment coalition8 seats | Party position What this means Argues for a national interest test before accepting agreements from the United Nations and its agencies that would limit domestic decision-making, and emphasises that domestic law comes first. | Evidence and checksVerification note: Ministry of Health material confirms that the government rejected the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations, but that decision belongs to the government as a whole and cannot be attributed to New Zealand First alone. |
Te Pāti MāoriParliamentary opposition4 seats | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |
Opportunity PartyNo seats in Parliament0 seatsCurrently has no seats in Parliament | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |
Alliance PartyAlliance Party of Aotearoa New ZealandNo seats in Parliament0 seatsRegistered on 5 August 2026 | Party position What this means Sets out social justice, diplomacy, opposition to wars of aggression and Pacific solidarity as the principles of an independent foreign policy. | Evidence and checksVerification note: Only statements of principle are available at present, and no separate foreign affairs or defence policy document has been released. |
Te Tai Tokerau PartyNo seats in Parliament0 seatsLeader is a sitting MP, with no parliamentary caucus | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |
Free PalestineNo seats in Parliament0 seatsRegistered on 5 August 2026 | Party position What this means Supports the return of Palestinian refugees, and argues for a single state solution that is secular, democratic and binational, with equal citizenship. | Evidence and checks |
| Party position What this means Argues that New Zealand should withdraw from its formal security alliance with the United States and take a more independent foreign policy. | Evidence and checks | |
NZ LoyalNew Zealand LoyalNo seats in Parliament0 seatsRegistered on 5 August 2026 | Party position What this means The party's policy page argues for withdrawing from international organisations and arrangements it considers harmful to national sovereignty, naming the United Nations, the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum, and for negotiating bilateral agreements directly instead. | Evidence and checksVerification note: The evidence comes from a web archive made before the party was registered. The World Economic Forum is not an intergovernmental organisation that can be left in the same way as the United Nations or the World Health Organization. |
Outdoors & FreedomNZ Outdoors & Freedom PartyNo seats in Parliament0 seatsCurrently has no seats in Parliament | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |
Conservative PartyConservative Party NZNo seats in Parliament0 seatsCurrently has no seats in Parliament | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |
Vision NZVision New ZealandNo seats in Parliament0 seatsCurrently has no seats in Parliament | Party position What this means Argues for withdrawing from the United Nations and the Paris Agreement, and for removing what the party calls race-based policies. | Evidence and checks |
Women's Rights PartyNo seats in Parliament0 seatsCurrently has no seats in Parliament | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |
Animal Justice PartyAnimal Justice Party Aotearoa New ZealandNo seats in Parliament0 seatsCurrently has no seats in Parliament | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Open the full party page |
Legalise Cannabis PartyAotearoa Legalise Cannabis PartyNo seats in Parliament0 seatsCurrently has no seats in Parliament | No published position foundLast checked: 9 August 2026 | Profile source Open the full party page |